Nope. Fortunately there are laws protecting against discrimination on the basis of race, sexual orientation + religion
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @Smackoff01
I believe that
@Nero was banned for political leanings being a conservative he didn't violate the TOS2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Then maybe you should reread their TOS. Ultimately it's their choice.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Smackoff01
...And back we come. If you don't like Twitter, don't use their service. Can't have your cake and eat it too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @Smackoff01
I don't like the decision
@Twitter made about unfairly enforcing their TOS & will tell them so as much as I wish.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sheepvoter @Smackoff01
Sure. But this has nothing whatsoever to do with freedom of speech.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @Smackoff01
well
@jack touts@Twitter as a place where all voices are heard -that's how he describes it But they censor conservatives1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sheepvoter @Smackoff01
Bullshit. Plenty of conservatives are on my feed, none have been banned. They don't breach the TOS.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @Smackoff01
@nero is especially dangerous to the liberal agenda because they can't pigeon whole him like they do other conservatives1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I follow plenty of conservative speakers who manage not to violate fairly simple TOS.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.