Best evidence indicates few harms, so it's spurious to ascribe a plethora of problems to HPV vax. https://twitter.com/itsmepanda1/status/747775703920279553 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I've had a look at the study. It's reasonably bad, particularly their absurd conclusions.
@viva__lala@GeoffSchuler1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @itsmePanda1
For example their tests at 3 and 6 months had opposite results, which both times they counted as...
@viva__lala@GeoffSchuler1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @itsmePanda1
...evidence for vaccine damage. They tested hundreds of responses and picked out the 3 that were...
@viva__lala@GeoffSchuler2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @itsmePanda1
...significant but failed to report on the others that weren't. Pretty poor science.
@viva__lala@GeoffSchuler1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
Not to mention the blinding and subjectivity of test criteria, lack of reporting on primary criteria @viva__lala @GeoffSchuler
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.