Except that paper did exactly that, causally linking decline/changes in species to climate change.
But your entire argument rests on this absurd idea that no one has done any further work on a single model developed in 1987.
-
-
There are literally hundreds of climate models that have been developed, NASA isn't the only organisation who has worked on this.
-
no shit and they are adjusted they have a physics base but they have enough tubing parameters as yo be meaningless.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
no i didnt say that its not a model its a method of analysis and it is what nasa cites on its gistemp page as its method
-
its also mentioned in crutemp and NOAAs pages
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
my argument is taking the data QCing it and determining samples required for detection. We dobt have the capability regardless.
-
and spoiler alert bot only do we not have the number of QC stations reporting but yhey arent randomly distrobuted
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.