It also doesn't argue that mass shooters are all mentally ill, rather that many of them were reported to display...
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @ratman720
...signs of mental illness after the fact by media. In my opinion that's not enough to conclude anything.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @ratman720
Do you think post-hoc analysis of a person's actions by the media is proof of anything?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
personally having studied psych it is an overly broad narcissistic field with little to no value due to their injection of bias
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ratman720 @GidMK
but given the nature of our species the requisite lack of respect for life is demonstrative of mental illness
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ratman720 @GidMK
so post adhoc analysis isnt valid. But i dont think its wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ratman720
...those are two mutually conflicting statements mate. You may not think it's wrong, but you know it isn't right.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
you can be correct in an assessment for the qrong reasons
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ratman720
So you think that post-hoc assessment is intrinsically flawed but arrives at the right answer (which happens to be your opinion).
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Does that sound like a good way to come to a conclusion to you?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.