They just happen to fit your narrative better.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @ConversationUS
from you source of choice https://theconversation.com/regulating-people-not-just-guns-might-explain-australias-decline-in-mass-shootings-44770 … i am trying to find a related academic paper
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
i cant speak to youe mental health system or reporting laws but ours is shit
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
from that article it sounds like reporting by mental health prof is allowed to police. Here its not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ratman720
Mentally ill people are more likely to be victims of gun violence rather than the perpetrators https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2016/204/10/port-arthur-massacre-and-national-firearms-agreement-20-years-what-are-lessons …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @ratman720
Most violent people do not have mental illness, and most mentally ill people are not violent.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
never said either. Most mass shooters here are both and most are identified early but cannot be reported due to HIPPA act violations
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ratman720
No, most mass shooters are not mentally ill. Many have post-hoc diagnoses of personality disorders, but this is not the same.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
what is your definition of mentally ill. Mine includes personality disorders and irrational behavior
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ratman720
I use medical definitions. Otherwise you are creating your own definition.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If you have a look at the article you'll see that very few mass shooters have a diagnosable mental illness.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.