Actually from 98 to now rate of firearm death in the us had barely changed.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @DavidWAkin
again you just cherry picked your data. firearm deaths are not violent crime you just added a qualifier
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ratman720 @DavidWAkin
Why do you think that things that are causally related to firearm law should be excluded?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @DavidWAkin
because firearm law is an infringement of choice of the many to prevent the choice of a few.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ratman720 @DavidWAkin
But we can decrease rates of suicide through gun legislation. How do you justify inaction?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @DavidWAkin
because infringing on the many because of the self harm actions of the few isnt justifed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
we could significantly save lives if we banned automobiles automobile related deaths would decrease
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
if we banned dogs, dog related deaths would decrease. Its not an argument to do that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ratman720 @DavidWAkin
There is quite a large difference between gun control and gun bans.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
For example, we require licenses to drive cars, background checks and yearly registration
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
So by your argument perhaps you should regulate guns in a similar way?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.