direct per capita rates between cultures arent possible but rate changes within a culture are
-
-
given these factors focusing solely on firearm rates is willful neglect and activism not pragmatism
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and arguing about gun control after mass shootings which evidence shows has no impact is deceitful
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
fuck i dont even own a gun and i think the careful wording for selective results is bullshit.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
the more qualifiers you add to your statement the more cherry picked it is
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
especially when those qualifiers obfuscate very different impacts within the grouping
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
if gun control advocates said it will only impact suicide rates i wouldnt care as thats objective fact
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
grouping other shit in and trying to sell it at a tragedy is disgusting
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ratman720 @DavidWAkin
But the point is that there is a very strong impact on gun homicide rates. Australia shows that.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @DavidWAkin
sure gun homicide rates but thats not all homicides. Its not stopping slowing or decreasing homicides
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
In Australia it did. Homicides decreases caused by gun control. Same with suicides.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @DavidWAkin
sure they did but they decreased by the same amount in the US without gun control
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.