Want more?
-
-
Do you have links to these? As an immunologist, I'd love to read them.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Ryan_Mac_Phd
That
@Ryan_Mac_Phd also shows that@beneleo didn't read said paper.@GidMK@IevaZagante1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @TakeThatChem @beneleo and
Its a really bold claim, and I'm willing to read said papers. But can't w/o proper reference/link
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Ryan_Mac_Phd1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @TakeThatChem @Ryan_Mac_Phd and
OK, I sent you a citation, look it up. Took at least 4 tweets for the reference alone.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @beneleo @TakeThatChem and
I tried. You're citing something I cannot find. I kindly asked for a link, and will ask again.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Ryan_Mac_Phd @TakeThatChem and
I'm actually stunned that none of you seem to have heard of this before. 1970's research.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @beneleo @Ryan_Mac_Phd and
Because what we want to reference for our work is 1970s research?. Cutting-edge.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @Ryan_Mac_Phd and
Just because somebody discovered something B4 you were born doesn't make it invalid.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Nope but if it hasn't been confirmed in nearly 50 years the original research is probably wrong.
-
-
You'd expect such a momentous finding to have been replicated hundreds of times by now.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
That sugar suppresses your immune system is not a surprise to anyone who knows anything about alt. med.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.