Again; do you understand what a systematic review is for? How they work?
...and the same RCT that you linked before, which as I mentioned is superseded by a more recent SR.
-
-
It's interesting that you haven't cited this meta-analysis; http://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/113648 …
-
Which at first glance looks like good evidence, but sadly is very poorly conducted in a number of ways.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.