@HomeopathicDana @fermi239 @scilogscom Amongst other criticisms, it's fair to say the Langmuir article was hardly compelling evidence.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@fermi239@scilogscom Whether that is true or not, NO ONE can say that homeopathy is "implausible." No one in their right mind4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HomeopathicDana
@HomeopathicDana@fermi239@scilogscom If homeopathy were to be true, much of what we know about physics would be wrong. This means 1)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@fermi239@scilogscom If homeopathy were true, physics wouldn't have to change.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HomeopathicDana
@HomeopathicDana@fermi239@scilogscom It would absolutely have to change. Dilutions of 1000C make no physical sense whatsoever.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@fermi239@scilogscom Am I correct in assuming that you didn't read either article by Iris Bell?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HomeopathicDana
@HomeopathicDana@fermi239@scilogscom I read the one you linked. It didn't mention ultra-high dilutions, merely increased dilutions.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@HomeopathicDana@fermi239@scilogscom Even if you accept the largely theoretical idea that nanoparticles might have influence 1)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@HomeopathicDana@fermi239@scilogscom At lower dilutions, there is certainly no evidence that a dilution of 1000C would have any effect.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@HomeopathicDana You haven't responded to my fairly commonsense objections to your linked articles. Perhaps your theory is just wrong?
-
-
Replying to @HomeopathicDana
@HomeopathicDana Accusing me of not reading articles isn't an answer to my really very simple objections.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.