@EMcCra2 @drphyto @GeoffSchuler @edgeben ...I never said it was proof of anything. It explains why systematic reviews are proof.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben I'm trying to help you understand why a single study doesn't prove anything if there's a review.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben Because a systematic review will include the studies both for and against a position.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben Equal numbers are immaterial; EVERY study on the topic is looked at.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2 @drphyto @GeoffSchuler @edgeben A quick summation of the Cochrane assesment criteria for studies http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_21/21_4_assessment_of_study_quality_and_risk_of_bias.htm …
3:56 AM - 26 Apr 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.