@EMcCra2 @drphyto @GeoffSchuler @edgeben Equal numbers are immaterial; EVERY study on the topic is looked at.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben From the AAP; they looked at 20700 studies (they also looked at animals) http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2014/06/26/peds.2014-1079 …2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben You would only expect an equal number of studies for and against if there was no effect either way.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben I'm trying to explain why numbers of studies is not a useful test of bias.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben Because all studies aren't equal; small studies are less useful than big ones.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@EMcCra2 @drphyto @GeoffSchuler @edgeben If you had precisely equal numbers of studies it would probably be evidence that there WAS bias.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.