@EMcCra2 @drphyto @GeoffSchuler @edgeben Because a systematic review will include the studies both for and against a position.
@EMcCra2 @drphyto @GeoffSchuler @edgeben Because all studies aren't equal; small studies are less useful than big ones.
-
-
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben If you had precisely equal numbers of studies it would probably be evidence that there WAS bias.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben Also, animal studies are less useful than human. Studying mice gives far less info than humans. -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben And that's where systematic reviews come in; to sort out which studies are biased and flawed.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.