@EMcCra2 @drphyto @GeoffSchuler @edgeben ...I never said it was proof of anything. It explains why systematic reviews are proof.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben I'm trying to help you understand why a single study doesn't prove anything if there's a review.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben Because a systematic review will include the studies both for and against a position.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben Equal numbers are immaterial; EVERY study on the topic is looked at.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben The Cochrane review looked at 5000 studies http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub3/full …3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@EMcCra2 @drphyto @GeoffSchuler @edgeben They reviewed 4889 studies that their search terms returned. Check the methods.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.