@EMcCra2 @drphyto @GeoffSchuler @edgeben How so?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben It addresses your criticism that systematic reviews don't represent 'best evidence' 1)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben As you can see from the article they are an amalgamation of all the research done on a subject 2)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben And if they follow the guidelines properly they are the best evidence you can find about a topic 3)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben ...I never said it was proof of anything. It explains why systematic reviews are proof.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben I'm trying to help you understand why a single study doesn't prove anything if there's a review.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@drphyto@GeoffSchuler@edgeben Because a systematic review will include the studies both for and against a position.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@EMcCra2 @drphyto @GeoffSchuler @edgeben So if you show a single small study it's already been incorporated into the most recent review.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.