@EMcCra2 @edgeben @drphyto @doritmi @GeoffSchuler See there is a reason that these kind of studies would be much more convincing.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@edgeben@drphyto@doritmi@GeoffSchuler I strongly suggest you read this: http://canberra.libguides.com/content.php?pid=591487&sid=5015301 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@edgeben@drphyto@doritmi@GeoffSchuler You may disagree, but in this case it isn't opinion. You're simply wrong.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@edgeben@doritmi@GeoffSchuler The hierarchy of evidence isn't a set of arbitrary rules; we use reviews because they 1)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@edgeben@doritmi@GeoffSchuler They post their methods up before conducting the review and rigidly follow for transparency 1)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@edgeben@doritmi@GeoffSchuler They use objective, independent rating scales to analyze the quality of studies 2)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@edgeben@doritmi@GeoffSchuler And you can use their methods to reconduct the review and check their results 3)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@EMcCra2 @edgeben @doritmi @GeoffSchuler And particularly with Cochane, they are totally charitable and not funded by any shady companies 4)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.