@bodhibrian @SparkleBubbles1 @kath2cats @VaccineUK I have. It was a pretty pointless study, <30 participants, no blinding or randomisation.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @bodhibrian
@bodhibrian@SparkleBubbles1@kath2cats@VaccineUK Or, in other words, a study with so much bias as to be completely uncredible.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@bodhibrian@SparkleBubbles1@kath2cats also known as an anecdote, based on which Wakefield made his self-serving "recommendation"1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @bodhibrian
@bodhibrian@VaccineUK@SparkleBubbles1@kath2cats Actually we begin with the evidence, and are proven right with the evidence.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@SparkleBubbles1@kath2cats I'd say part of the problem was that the hypothesis couldn't be immediately refuted by evidence2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @VaccineUK
@GidMK@SparkleBubbles1@kath2cats All that could be said at time was there was no evidence supporting it. The contrary evidence took longer1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @VaccineUK
@VaccineUK@SparkleBubbles1@kath2cats It's also the difference between epidemiological and lab bench work. Epi takes more time and effort.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
@VaccineUK @SparkleBubbles1 @kath2cats It took 10 years to test millions of children to be absolutely certain that vax doesn't cause autism.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.