.@LifeToManifest @BeckyJohnson222 @thesciencepost When YouTube becomes peer-reviewed science I'll start to take it seriously.
-
-
Replying to @GeoffSchuler
@GeoffSchuler@BeckyJohnson222@thesciencepost WHO funds peer reviewed science? Follow the money.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @its_my_bliss
.@LifeToManifest
@BeckyJohnson222@thesciencepost Lots of people do. Governments, individuals, trust funds, universities, etc.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GeoffSchuler
@GeoffSchuler @LifeToManifest@BeckyJohnson222 Interestingly one of the groups that doesn't fund much research is the antivax movement.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @BeckyJohnson222
@BeckyJohnson222@GeoffSchuler @LifeToManifest You have an odd fixation on the CDC, as if they were the only ones researching vaccines.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @BeckyJohnson222
@BeckyJohnson222@GeoffSchuler @LifeToManifest But you ignore research from anywhere that isn't America don't you think that is myopic?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @BeckyJohnson222
@BeckyJohnson222 @LifeToManifest So you're familiar with the large Cochrane review that showed no link http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub3/full …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BeckyJohnson222 @LifeToManifest Or Australian lit reviews on worldwide studies showing no link http://www.ncirs.edu.au/assets/provider_resources/fact-sheets/mmr-vaccine-ibd-autism-fact-sheet.pdf …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.