@EMcCra2 @doritmi @aspiritcan @alafiadelight Ah contradiction. The last refuge of the woefully inconsistent argument.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight Have a read of this and come back to me about your semantic nonsense https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_proof …4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight We have statistical proof. Not 100% but that is literally how statistics works.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight Seriously, what don't you understand about statistical proof? It CAN'T be 100% ever.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight Sigh. You are ignoring a huge body of evidence because you don't understand how stats work.3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight It's like not believing in climate change because there is no mathematical proof.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight So again you misunderstand what the terms mathematical and statistical proof mean.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@EMcCra2 @doritmi @aspiritcan @alafiadelight You can't mathematically prove anything with a dataset. That's what stats are for.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.