@EMcCra2 @doritmi @aspiritcan @alafiadelight We can prove to an extremely high level of certainty. Again, you are arguing semantics here.
@EMcCra2 @doritmi @aspiritcan @alafiadelight Have a read of this and come back to me about your semantic nonsense https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_proof …
-
-
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight We have statistical proof. Not 100% but that is literally how statistics works. -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@GidMK But your BOUGHT science doesn't do proof. So in fact you don't have.. @EMcCra2@doritmi @alafiadelightpic.twitter.com/8zHL08gKYE
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@GidMK Statistical proof. @EMcCra2@doritmi @alafiadelightpic.twitter.com/BQ1YdscpKO
-
@aspiritcan@GidMK @EMcCra2 @alafiadelight no, that's not statistical proof vaccines have harms, - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight Lol so you don't understand how studies work then? Have you ever read one? - Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.