@EMcCra2 @doritmi @aspiritcan @alafiadelight It says that, even discounting studies with ANY bias, there is more than enough evidence 1.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight To conclude that vaccines don't cause autism 2.4 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight 'Proven' is a silly word. The evidence favours the rejection of the claim that vax=>autism.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight We can't 'prove' that antibiotics cure bacterial disease in the sense you mean.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight You are just arguing semantics here now. It is 'proven' to a reasonable level of certainty.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight 'Claims' are anecdotes. The plural of anecdote is not data, and therefore not evidence.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@EMcCra2 @doritmi @aspiritcan @alafiadelight Nope. Anecdotes are a starting point. They give you a question to ask, which studies answer.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.