@EMcCra2 @doritmi @aspiritcan @alafiadelight Have a look at what rankings in terms of evidence they gave and why they gave them.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight ...this supports no association btwn autism and vaccines. Check page 147-153.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight Not even close to what it says, perhaps you should re-read.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight It says that, even discounting studies with ANY bias, there is more than enough evidence 1.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight To conclude that vaccines don't cause autism 2.4 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight 'Proven' is a silly word. The evidence favours the rejection of the claim that vax=>autism.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@EMcCra2 @doritmi @aspiritcan @alafiadelight 'proof' isn't used in analysis because mathematically you can't 'prove' anything with stats.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@doritmi@aspiritcan @alafiadelight We can prove to an extremely high level of certainty. Again, you are arguing semantics here.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.