-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@mrhawkes@doritmi Also can't remember which one you haven't seen yet; http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/134/2/325.short … http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X14006367%20 … again.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance033 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2
@mrhawkes@doritmi They aren't. We have evidence from more than 15million people. That is enough to find any effect, even tiny.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @Vbalance03
@EMcCra2 @mrhawkes @doritmi Serious question; how many people do you need to be analyzed for it to be adequate? 15mil is enough for me.
3:40 PM - 20 Feb 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.