@ktibus @SueIeraci At least 3 times she says that something is 'commonly accepted' without a reference. None of these things are accepted.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@SueIeraci So she is saying that not many people are dying from infectious diseases, so it's more cost effective to let them die1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ktibus
@ktibus@SueIeraci It's the same old antivax story; diseases downplayed, social inequity more important, vaccines don't work anyway.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@SueIeraci Citing papers on immunolgy and homeostasis from 1950s.......2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ktibus
@ktibus@SueIeraci Now she is quite literally misunderstanding how natural selection works.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@SueIeraci So much for the claims about this is about public policy. She is making specific scientific claims.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ktibus
@ktibus@SueIeraci As someone looking to do a PhD in public health I am astonished by how low the standards are; it can't be this easy.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @SueIeraci
@SueIeraci@ktibus Still looking for a supervisor! Perhaps in a year or two, who knows.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@SueIeraci Burnett must be spinning in his grave at the complete misrepresentation of his work.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@ktibus @SueIeraci Oh I suspect that almost any of the authors she cites would disagree with her blatant misrepresentations.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.