-
-
Replying to @reasonable_hank
@reasonable_hank@DrTremmo Non registered objectors already do not receive childcare payments before this law came in.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@reasonable_hank@DrTremmo The main reason given for not vaccinating is lack of access, which is defined in any number of ways.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@reasonable_hank hate oversimplifying but comes down to: will this intervention improve vaccination rates - yes or no? Answer=Y1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrTremmo
@DrTremmo@reasonable_hank Increasing vaccination rates is great, but the cost-benefit needs to be weighed, particularly the social costs.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @ktibus
@ktibus@DrTremmo@reasonable_hank One example; children of anti-vaxxers lose out on childcare because of their parents.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@ktibus@DrTremmo@reasonable_hank Causes unnecessary harm to a child (social isolation) when their parent is to blame.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@DrTremmo@reasonable_hank Maybe. Maybe not. But in this case the good of the community far outweighs any such cost.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ktibus
@ktibus@DrTremmo@reasonable_hank But that is the thing. Even if every objector vaccinates, the rates will not increase v. much.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ktibus @DrTremmo @reasonable_hank Objectors ~39,000 kids. Non-objectors (who currently are missing out on benefits anyway) ~150,000
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.