@GidMK @reasonable_hank 1/2: policy will increase vax rates amongst lower SES - we see many who are behind for non-ideological reasons
-
-
Replying to @DrTremmo
@DrTremmo@reasonable_hank But that is the difficulty; for people who are challenged to access vaccines, this will be one more barrier.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @reasonable_hank
@reasonable_hank@DrTremmo The evidence suggests that is not the case sadly.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @reasonable_hank
@reasonable_hank@DrTremmo Non registered objectors already do not receive childcare payments before this law came in.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@reasonable_hank@DrTremmo The main reason given for not vaccinating is lack of access, which is defined in any number of ways.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@reasonable_hank hate oversimplifying but comes down to: will this intervention improve vaccination rates - yes or no? Answer=Y1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrTremmo
@DrTremmo@reasonable_hank Increasing vaccination rates is great, but the cost-benefit needs to be weighed, particularly the social costs.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@reasonable_hank Well I'm a clinician not a sociologist - my concern is minimising the number of grieving families I have to help2 replies 3 retweets 6 likes
@DrTremmo @reasonable_hank A laudable goal. I am mostly concerned with providing proven effective, cost-effective interventions.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.