@GidMK there is evidence that financial incentives may raise vax rates. We found it. Why couldn't they? @UniSydneyHealth
-
-
Replying to @reasonable_hank
@reasonable_hank @UniSydneyHealth Financial incentives certainly. But financial punishment?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @reasonable_hank
@reasonable_hank @UniSydneyHealth It is rescinding benefits that are universal, rather than providing benefits to parents that immunize.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@reasonable_hank 1/2: policy will increase vax rates amongst lower SES - we see many who are behind for non-ideological reasons1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DrTremmo
@DrTremmo@reasonable_hank But that is the difficulty; for people who are challenged to access vaccines, this will be one more barrier.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@reasonable_hank wrong. Excluding some (rare) remote areas vaccines couldn't be more accessible without putting in the water supply1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrTremmo
@DrTremmo@reasonable_hank Accessibility is about more than the location of clinics. It is a complex issue of health equity.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK@reasonable_hank agreed. But a simple intervention -> incremental improvement beats waiting for a 'perfect' and complete solution1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrTremmo
@DrTremmo@reasonable_hank The problem is that this is targeted at mainly high SES people (anti vaxxers) but will effect mostly low SES.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DrTremmo @reasonable_hank Most unvaccinated/late vaccinated kids are: 1. (largely) low-SES; 2. Not objectors
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.