@GrahamGords1001 But we come back to the fact that NRT is addictive, and can be dangerous in its own right. Probably like ecigs.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GrahamGords1001
@GrahamGords1001 Also btw that 95% seems to have been pulled out of thin air, there is no clinical data to support those numbers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GrahamGords1001
@GrahamGords1001 I had a read of the paper, it is basically a group of smart people discussing their opinions. Not really evidence sadly.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GrahamGords1001
@GrahamGords1001 My point is that 95% is arbitrary-they could have chosen 80, 85, 90 etc and you still wouldn't know why.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GrahamGords1001
@GrahamGords1001 Have a look at that SR. It is a bit premature to draw conclusions as to how much safer they are.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@GrahamGords1001 But none of this gets us to a firm estimate of harm. There is no evidential basis to say .05 RR for example
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.