-
-
Replying to @BigVapingNunga
@BigVapingNunga@Stivvt@mihotep "Electronic cigarettes can hardly be considered harmless" recent systematic review …http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy1.library.usyd.edu.au/science/article/pii/S0091743514003739 …3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
.
@BigVapingNunga@Stivvt honest mistake@GidMK. It's hard to distinguish genuine science from cherry picked drivel http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/s12916-014-0264-5.pdf …1 reply 5 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mihotep
@mihotep@BigVapingNunga@Stivvt Article is pretty on the ball. Probably need to regulate ecigs a bit, but they are better than smoking.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK indeed. There's also this comparison against smoking & purified air http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233315001228 … Guess which one#vaping is most like1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK that argument ignores about 50M "anecdotes" worldwide whose lives were improved by#ecigs. Similar to this
http://www.bmj.com/content/327/7429/1459 …1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
@GidMK you're right, but there's context for it http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110871/ … It adds to overwhelming evidence that#vaping is safe & effective1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@mihotep Particularly when you consider that almost half of ecig studies are currently funded by the manufacturers. COI?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.