@pharmerfour @theMJA The review was into the government rebate for these services, it is mixed public/private funding.
-
-
Replying to @pharmerfour
@pharmerfour@theMJA It is a complex question, but generally without the govt subsidy it is not profitable for PHF to fund services.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pharmerfour
@pharmerfour@theMJA Well probably not if the procedures are ineffective, hence the review.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pharmerfour
@pharmerfour@theMJA In theory? Perhaps. In practice PHI is more of a political golf ball. Everyone wants a hit but v. little progress made.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pharmerfour
@pharmerfour@theMJA Yes. But that is not how it has worked out; costs have increased with little benefit https://theconversation.com/should-taxpayers-subsidise-extras-for-private-health-insurance-holders-39504 …6 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@pharmerfour @theMJA 3) I disagree with. Savings for the govt can blow out costs over the whole health system, ending in more govt costs.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.