Not that this is scientific, but wanted to frame this issue:pic.twitter.com/2oDAjsU4lx
Epidemiologist. Writer (Guardian, Observer etc). "Well known research trouble-maker". PhDing at @UoW Host of @senscipod Email gidmk.healthnerd@gmail.com he/him
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.
| Country | Code | For customers of |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40404 | (any) |
| Canada | 21212 | (any) |
| United Kingdom | 86444 | Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2 |
| Brazil | 40404 | Nextel, TIM |
| Haiti | 40404 | Digicel, Voila |
| Ireland | 51210 | Vodafone, O2 |
| India | 53000 | Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance |
| Indonesia | 89887 | AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata |
| Italy | 4880804 | Wind |
| 3424486444 | Vodafone | |
| » See SMS short codes for other countries | ||
This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.
Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.
When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.
The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.
Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.
Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.
Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.
See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.
Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.
Not that this is scientific, but wanted to frame this issue:pic.twitter.com/2oDAjsU4lx
Atomsk's Sanakan Retweeted Atomsk's Sanakan
Re: "Not that this is scientific, but wanted to frame this issue:"
Sort of cowardly to hide this from whom you're tweeting about. But I guess I shouldn't be surprised coming from an @TheEliKlein fan.
Finally finished misrepresenting?https://twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan/status/1439088987918979074 …
Atomsk's Sanakan added,
Maybe, @AngryCardio, you should have included the context about posting a garbage article on a pre-print server after it was rejected 3 times, with distortions that competent peer review would have easily caught.
That too inconvenient for you to mention?
https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1438298708634972160 …pic.twitter.com/KBCvywbSz5
I will have to thank @GidMK for answering my poll.
I do public reviews all the time, but did not answer the poll
Joking, dude.
I don't get it, apologies
No sweat—you were brought in late. Some folks are complaining about the recent COVID vaccine myocarditis preprint because is was apparently rejected 3 times & reviewed were not posted. I said I never heard of posting manuscript reviews; you were used as an example of it.
Not posting the reviews depends on context - not responding to the reviews is weirder. The question to me is whether the authors took the comments on board or if the posted preprint is mostly unchanged because that would be less than ideal
No way to know. All this started when a professor of medicine & surgery poo-poo’ed the preprint because “it was rejected 3 times”. I said rejections alone don’t reflect poor quality, and you can judge for yourself.
Rejections are meaningless, agreed. That being said, if peer reviewers point out issues that are not addressed, with the paper then just posted as a preprint, that's less than ideal. Easy for the authors to clear up
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.