"There's enough behind ivermectin for COVID-19 that there must be something there"
This is a point that I find fascinating 
Fair point. I would say that I think if you ignore the fraud that there are now more pretty reasonably null trials for ivermectin than for most stuff we use - usually the issue is a lack of studies, not that studies largely fail to find a benefit
-
-
And that could obvs change, and we could certainly find a benefit! But ignoring the last 12 months, and excluding the fraud, I do wonder how people might view ivm based only on the actual evidence at hand. Would use be so widespread without Elgazzar and Niaee?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
