"There's enough behind ivermectin for COVID-19 that there must be something there"
This is a point that I find fascinating 
-
-
What got me thinking about all of this is that we excluded lopinavir/ritonavir as a treatment based on not that much more null evidence than we now have for ivermectin. We need to finish the bigger trials, for many reasons, but still interesting
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What remains? Self interest, grifting, paranoia, pseudoscientific and anti scientific thinking, misinformation, disinformation, political ideology etc etc
-
You forgot to mention horse paste
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Could you kindly do the same investigation for mask after? Would be also very interesting i feel
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Fraud
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
endlessly fascinating to me how many people want you to look into “efficacy of masks” or whatever when it’s blindingly obvious that they work. it’s such a simple concept and yet somehow it eludes them still.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who is conducting a trial of Ivermectin regarding COVID-19?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
