"There's enough behind ivermectin for COVID-19 that there must be something there"
This is a point that I find fascinating 
-
-
What then separates ivermectin from other repurposed drugs? Popularity?pic.twitter.com/aKSrYM3CfG
Show this thread -
Anyway, this doesn't mean that we should stop the ongoing large trials into ivermectin, but I do think it's an interesting point worth considering. Take away the fraud, rewind to the actual evidence, and what remains?
Show this thread -
What got me thinking about all of this is that we excluded lopinavir/ritonavir as a treatment based on not that much more null evidence than we now have for ivermectin. We need to finish the bigger trials, for many reasons, but still interesting
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What's your response to this statement?: There haven't been more large RCTs because they are expensive and big pharma won't fund them. And then when they do, they're designed to fail e.g. treating too late.
-
I assume you simply won't reply, but if you do, also would like your thoughts on thishttps://indianexpress.com/article/cities/lucknow/uttar-pradesh-government-says-ivermectin-helped-to-keep-deaths-low-7311786/ …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


