This week in ivermectin news: - one RCT that a co-author believes is fake and is trying to get retracted - one RCT that could not have happened as described - one RCT where the author team are currently having two other studies retracted for potential fraud
-
-
“That a co-author believes is fake” I have some questions
-
Questions will be answered soon!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
but dont be fooled PANDA and co will get something new out there soon
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Carvalho was observational btw, not RCT. Is not Carvalho?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this on the same level as retraction from Lancet Re hydroxychloroquin
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder if you would ever be convinced if a study showed it worked, or you would always look for something to attack it (author's previous life , etc.).
-
He’s not attacking anyone personally he’s pointing out major problems and outright fraud in these studies. Why don’t you ask the author who wants his own study retracted your question.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So I again notice that you STILL aren't mentioning the large JAMA study from a place where Ivermectin is OTC, and with the control group having the same side effect profiles as the group taking Ivermectin. Thou shalt only critique studies showing it's effective though.
-
Source?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.