This graphic has been passed around a lot by the ivermectin crowd, so I thought I'd very briefly explain why it's quite clearly incorrect 1/10pic.twitter.com/hfecgKyf1L
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
10/10 To sum up - this graphic is meaningless. Neither the exposure OR the outcome are correct. Many people in the orange countries received ivermectin, and many more people than recorded in the blue countries likely died of COVID-19pic.twitter.com/ElpxQ4z7Yd
11/10 One minor addendum - this took me a total of about half an hour to check. The study itself is simple, and looking up information on mass ivermectin distribution is not that complex
The incorrect graphic has been shared 10,000s of times 
12/10 It is also worth briefly clarifying that this is only one method of ivermectin distribution - it does not include private prescription and uptake of ivermectin in any African countries during the pandemic, which is probably also a huge amounthttps://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1436201926568251393?s=20 …
Also, many poorer countries have younger populations, many of whom live and work primarily outdoors. “Indoor” locations often effectively outdoors due to lack of windows. (Eg My parents work in Angolan hospital; testing is issue but even suspected cases have been rare to date)
Thank you for such a clear explanation.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.