If somebody is claiming to be a serious meta-analyst on ivermectin for covid 19 ask them "which trials have you seen the data for?" If it's September 2021 and they're not reviewing raw data, but promoting debunked papers like Elgazzar, Carvallo, Niaee etc, ask why.
-
-
I personally disagree, although I recognise that's a fair and reasonable position. I take a more subjective view. I think onus is dependent on the claims made, because they treat them as similarly "proof" I am as interested in how they reviewed the objectively lesser studies.
-
I am amazed that all studies of treatments are put under the magnifying glass yet the current experimental
#Covid treatments are accepted without question
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do you expect the same form Pfizer et al and their rushed vaccines or are you waiting until they finish with us
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Personally I think the positive experience in India is worth a 100 papers
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.