5/n As to whether this impacts the meta-analyses of ivermectin: obviously it has a large impact This was THE LARGEST STUDY included in the analysis in question. It is clear that it made a BIG difference
-
-
I’ll be curious what happens to the meta analysis if Together Trial results get incorporated post publication.
-
Completely reverses the findings, with a fairly strong null result for ivermectin
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
'... instead, [the negative IVM assessment] was based on a somewhat vague and possibly biased subjective assessment of the quality of the trials themselves and erroneously concluding “no effect” from what was merely weaker evidence of a positive effect.' Is a heck of a statement
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There’s no “potential” in the Ivermectin fraud. It’s just fraud.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wish
@PeterAttiaMD@ZDoggMD and@BretWeinstein would read your analysis and comment, I appreciate what you’re doing. -
I've offered to walk them through it but thus far no one is interested in why they may be mistaken, only in saying nasty things about me

- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.