Another fairly well-read ivermectin study, included in meta-analyses, definitely fraudulent Story soon
-
-
Also, the authors were perhaps premature in publishing this letter as there are more retractions to come I suspect
-
Actually there are coordinated letters. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097%2FMJT.0000000000001450 … and https://dx.doi.org/10.1097%2FMJT.0000000000001450 … in addition to the one above. Can
@gorskon (editorial board member?) shed any light on the journal's role in all this? - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.