6/n Immediately on looking at the pre-registration, there is a HUGE discrepancy with the published results Here's what the authors pre-registered as their exclusion and the flow chart from the study. Notice the difference?pic.twitter.com/eMFPtwG9Y6
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Hi, please find the unroll here: This study is a common citation of ivermectin believers, has been… https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1435128867027501056.html … Talk to you soon. 
Day 0 was a swap day...so wouldn't it be day 0 Ct>35 day 2 Ct>35 (or day 6 Ct>35 until early September) ?https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1435128891379621891?s=20 …
Explanation here if you want to know.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdEbJ8TJDkw&t=287s …
Cursory glance at study. Here's my take: They enrolled patients with positive PCR test. = patients suspected of covid. This includes patients who tested Ct>35. /1
Patients who test Ct>35 have a high chance of not having covid. If their consecutive test is <35 that suggests increasing viral load, i. e. sickness. Patients whose 2nd test is also >35 do not have covid. /2
Ok, so what does this potentially say about risk/reward of using IVM as a treatment for C19? I appreciate you pointing out the clear fraud in some of the studies that showed positive results, yet I still took IVM a few weeks ago when I had it due to studies like this one.
It's not fraud. It's a better than average study design that non-clinical data analysts don't understand. This study actually tries to do something about the problem of high Ct, non-covid, but PCR positive results.
Also important to note that the manufacturer of the testing device used in the study recommends a CT of >40 as negative for covid, which means that the numbers below that are less reliable.
Do you have a reference for that? If true, it would rather obviate the results
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.