13/n Anyway, the main issue is that, if you use the pre-registered protocol, the study appears to have null results
And yet, reported as positive to massive worldwide acclaim 
-
Show this thread
-
14/n This has nothing to do with fraud, takes literally minutes to check, and I encourage everyone to do so. Please let me know if I've made an error somewhere
1 reply 6 retweets 146 likesShow this thread -
15/n Also, to be clear - I'm not accusing the authors of any research misconduct, this is just very basic due diligence that everyone should do for any trial that they read
13 replies 6 retweets 133 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @GidMK
You are overlooking the fact that the CT was changed after he cultured the virus and determined that no live virus could be find over 30 cycles. Your point doesn't invalidate the result at all. Significant differences could also be found by comparing daily viral loads as well.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GabinJean3
That is immaterial to the issue at hand, which is to do with post-hoc alterations to study protocols. The proper analysis would be including all patients randomised and treated, this is known as the "intention to treat" method of analysis
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
Don't you think there is a more important point to discuss, ie the results of this study for example?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GabinJean3
If you run the pre registered analysis the results appear to be null, which means that this question is fundamental to whether this study shows a benefit or no benefit for ivm
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
Not true. There is also a statistically different at day 6 and 8.pic.twitter.com/lAb0fxfg0f
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @GidMK
Your thread as I see it, aims to sow doubts on the results of a study, based on methodological issues, to feed your narrative that the ivermectin advocates are not basing their position on sound science. Always the method, never the results.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The results are based on the methods, without which they are entirely meaningless
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.