2/n The study is here, and has an objectively large impact with nearly a dozen news stories and an Altmetric of 2750https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1 …
-
-
13/n Anyway, the main issue is that, if you use the pre-registered protocol, the study appears to have null results And yet, reported as positive to massive worldwide acclaim
Show this thread -
14/n This has nothing to do with fraud, takes literally minutes to check, and I encourage everyone to do so. Please let me know if I've made an error somewhere
Show this thread -
15/n Also, to be clear - I'm not accusing the authors of any research misconduct, this is just very basic due diligence that everyone should do for any trial that they read
Show this thread -
16/n Also worth noting that it is entirely possible the study still has some positive results when you add these patients back in - the point is their primary outcome, which is the main thing reported, seems to change substantially when these people are included!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.