If your response to "many studies supporting ivermectin appear to be fraudulent" is "but, vaccines!" then I can only assume you don't really care about evidence or facts 
-
-
So I agree with you. 100%. But it isn’t enough. What’s the best approach to convince others? Or is it simply a case of “you can’t reason others out of positions that they didn’t reason themselves into.”? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s because they are better at it, which makes it even worse!!
-
/s, because this is the Internet and I don’t want to be one more instance of Poe’s law.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This sentence could be read that you see no fraud red flags for Ivermectin … which I think os not what you mean. Bad actors may quote this maliciously.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The other weird thing about the ivermectin crowd, is that if ivermectin worked, it would have worked. There were enough people chugging it that it would have had a real-world effect. Which IS exactly what we're seeing wiht the vaccines.
-
I’m using it as a laxative, so I’m covered both ways.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.