Another fairly well-read ivermectin study, included in meta-analyses, definitely fraudulent Story soon
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But the title alone makes it so compelling
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you explain why that’s a “really low-quality useless review paper”? I’m neutral here, but it seems people on both sides of this topic (many topics) will ignore (or shit on) any data that doesn’t support a decision they’ve already made. That doesn’t seem helpful for anyone.pic.twitter.com/4B0sxkEcGu
-
I already put together a thread on this:https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1425297498042556423?s=20 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
