And therefore it's reasonable to add to a treatment regimen with caution and advising patients of risk benefits and uncertainties, and maligning doctors for using their clinical instincts is bullshit, and the idea we "know it's useless" is bullshit. Do u oppose any of this?
-
-
Replying to @EdoajoEric @ydeigin and
If so, id love to debate. If not, im not sure what there is to debate, but a discussion may be fruitful.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @EdoajoEric @ydeigin and
If you stand by your "ivermectin is shit" comment for example, there's probably fertile ground for a good debate.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Hey, I’m always up for a discussion. I definitely stand by my “IVM is shit” jingle when it comes to prophylaxis, and while I am much more open to Covid *treatments*, I’m not sure I would use IVM today given the 6 RCTs showing no efficacy (and potential danger).
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ydeigin @EdoajoEric and
I generally don't follow video podcasts but for a debate between
@EdoajoEric and@ydeigin I'd do an exception very happily.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @debe @EdoajoEric and
I mean, we could go over those RCTs and discuss what we each see in them that forms the basis of our interpretation.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
all for this
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @ydeigin @JocelynnPearl and
Should we bring
@GidMK and@K_Sheldrick on and make it a panel?2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.