Should note that at least one more large study is almost certainly fraud, so I suspect the joyous proclamations by this dude who has blocked me are going to get filtered down even more
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a cult.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow. They just have no idea of their own bias.
-
"On the one hand some proponents greatly exaggerate it's likely effects".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Flávio is a so-called pedantic mathematician who defends the method of calculating astronomical p-values but does not understand how to carry out a systematic review.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Not to mention when people share a paper and when it gets retracted they claim "It's censorship! They retracted it for political reasons!" e.g. this anti-facemask garbage: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/ …pic.twitter.com/zNSkEXQ9sQ
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Flavio has been a spreader of false information regarding early treatment since the start. April 2020 he was already sure HCQ cured covid... only moved goalposts. At least he is not antivax, but I wonder how being surrounded by antivax charlatans does not raise him some alarms.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting that Lawrie is lauded as being an expert at using Cochrane methods and producing the best meta-analysis, yet the actual Cochrane meta-analysis isn't mentioned anywhere in the thread Nor is the damage done to her meta-analysis by fraud, that she has not corrected
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.