So you do this thing where you try to put words in people's mouths. Don't do it, it's not nice at all and indicates bad faith. For clarity, I have agreed to no such thing. Now that you know you misunderstood my comments, I hope to hear from you an acknowledgement that you did.
-
-
Maybe a barrister.... no offence to barristers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol. I can't get around this morally object to a study design that has negative results but no moral objection with a similar study designs with positive results.
-
This is so like the HCQ arguments: can't trust the 10th negative trial because they didn't give zinc on day 5 right at midnight. Wish folks would move on to Luvox at least some strong prelim data with that one
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I particularly hate when you're having a discussion with someone and they tell you that you're putting words into their mouth.1:they are typing it so, they can't be put into your mouth.2:you literally just said the thing that I confirmed that you said, no need for mouth putting
-
Right, exactly Except everything Health Nerd accused Alexandros of saying he didn’t say or type So wrong
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s pretty hilarious that
@alexandrosM has a problems with the TOGETHER trial being “negligent” for not using the FLCCC’s IVM dosing…..but somehow he has zero issue with the FLCCC not collecting efficacy or safety data on their own experimental protocol
talk about negligent - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
-
This is so stupid.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I know why you waste your time with people like that, but at the same time don't know why you waste your time with people like that!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
