@GidMK Please do it.
-
-
Replying to @EpistemologyPro @EduEngineer
Health Nerd Retweeted Kyle Sheldrick
Lol, he doesn't have a great record of following through. Just wants to debate straw men that are tediously wrong and then blocks people who point this outhttps://twitter.com/K_Sheldrick/status/1431530150068252673?s=19 …
Health Nerd added,
6 replies 1 retweet 19 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @EpistemologyPro
I blocked him because when I offered to debate the actual point we were debating, then he dodged and ran away. He also refused to show documentation claimed about that author not sharing data. I blocked him to stop wasting time.
3 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @EduEngineer @EpistemologyPro
Nah, you just wanted to debate something no one had said, then go back to the false dichotomy of "either a confounder impacts one study or all studies" as if that makes the slightest bit of sense
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Precise. And at time he wanted a debate he displayed an anti-semitic extreme right avatar.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
LOL. "His picture of an NFT frog with laser eyes harmed Jews and hurt the dispossessed." That's such a pathetic smear. Yeah, Leandro refused to discuss math with me too, and couldn't answer basic stats questions from my exam designed for high school students.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @EduEngineer @leandrotessler and
Gidmk is the racist.
@K_Sheldrick - Unwilling to counter accusations of being an Anglo-chauvinist - Unwilling to engage with coloreds. Not good enough 4 him? - Unwilling to critique Oxford RECOVERY statistics models, esp the exclusion of confounders like obesity, co-medications2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @OutOfTheDarkAge @EduEngineer and
I’m finding no shortage of collaborators that are people of color on recent papers he has put together as a corresponding and first author, even a doctor currently practicing in India! So where is your evidence?pic.twitter.com/MD6W2kfZXL
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mjtimber2 @EduEngineer and
Let him critique Cochrane, BMJ, HCQ RCTs, etc as he does other sources Arvind Subramanium ("4m dead in India" mind-bogglingly atrocious study) was paid by UK FCO to create a narrative. Racially Indian; but loyal to the liberal Anglo-Canadian narrative.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @OutOfTheDarkAge @EduEngineer and
What makes you presume he hasn’t? You’re welcome to point out errors in them if you see them. Go right ahead. Or you can pretend it’s a racist pretense. So why did he bring in those collaborators? All willing participants in the vicious Anglo-Canadian plot?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I do point out errors in many different publications, although to be frank it's quite hard to find errors in Cochrane and they correct them very quickly when you do!
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @mjtimber2 and
No the do not. Cochrane HCQ examples: 1. Why exclude the 2 largest included studies just from Adverse Effects meta? RECOVERY & SOLIDARITY 2. They say there is no evidence on HCQ in mild but conclude "b/c it does not work in late stage, we can't think it will work in early"
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.