Meta-analysis models combine estimates together into a weighted average This does not confer any additional rigor on the estimates. It's just a different way of averaging results
-
-
If someone says that a result is more robust because it's in a meta-analysis, imagine they were saying the same thing about a simple mean Does it still make sense?
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.