Can we do better than @BetterSkeptics?
The only BS referee qualified to assess biomedical claims validated 36 of 44 submitted claims as false or unsubstantiated. Incredibly, only 3 were ultimately endorsed by the BS project as such.
Can we do better? I think so.https://twitter.com/ydeigin/status/1430495331393884160 …
-
Show this thread
-
It’s very easy: all the claims are available in the following spreadsheet. Could you nominate your favorite biomedical experts to quickly go through those claims and make a binary assessment of how many of those 44 claims they would have validated?https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nEsf6l_dEv_NQqLvoHYP-eRZ0UmZGqo16uSHub53h9Q …
4 replies 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
I would like to nominate
@grahamwalker.,@GidMK and@K_Sheldrick. Could you kindly post your verdict in this thread?2 replies 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread
Haven't had time to go through every claim there, but so far all of the ones about prophylaxis or treatment using IVM are either unsupported or entirely untrue
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.